Doppel Named Official Partner of the New York Knicks
Partnership to Showcase Doppel to Knicks Widespread Audience Through In-Arena, Digital and Out-Of-Home Assets
These 9 deepfake examples show how social engineering attacks now bypass enterprise defenses, from fake CFO video calls to synthetic KYC fraud.

Deepfakes have moved from a theoretical concern to a working enterprise attack vector with measurable consequences. Losses from fraud powered by generative AI in the U.S. alone are on track to hit $40 billion by 2027, up from $12.3 billion in 2023.
Finance employees are wiring tens of millions based on synthetic video calls, attackers are being hired into engineering roles using AI-generated identities, and consumer-facing scams are running on the cloned faces and voices of named executives.
The deepfake examples in this article come from documented incidents at real companies and show how the attack has matured across executive authorization, hiring and onboarding, identity verification, and public-figure impersonation in social engineering attacks.
Key Takeaways
Deepfake attacks now succeed against enterprises because generative models have outpaced the verification habits that most people learned. Four shifts in the underlying technology explain why employees can no longer spot a fake the way they used to.
Attackers no longer need a sophisticated operation to mount a convincing impersonation; they need a few minutes of public audio, an off-the-shelf avatar tool, and a target whose verification habits trace back to an earlier era.
The highest-loss incidents on record involve attackers impersonating executives to authorize wire transfers or extract sensitive information. In each of the deepfake examples below, the attackers exploited the trust employees place in a senior leader's voice or face.
A finance employee at Arup's Hong Kong office received a phishing email purportedly from the UK-based CFO. Initially skeptical, the employee joined a video call and encountered what appeared to be the CFO and several familiar colleagues, all of whom were AI-generated deepfakes. The employee executed a series of wire transfers across multiple bank accounts before exposing the fraud to Arup headquarters through a separate channel.
The incident shows how a multi-participant deepfake call can override the instinct to double-check, particularly when several "colleagues" appear to corroborate the request in real time.
Fraudsters created a fake WhatsApp account using a publicly available image of WPP CEO Mark Read, then set up a Microsoft Teams meeting that appeared to include Read and a senior executive. During the meeting, they ran a voice clone built from public interviews, impersonated Read, asked the target to set up a new business, and solicited money.
In this attack, WhatsApp carried the identity setup, Teams video carried the audio and visual impersonation, and meeting chat carried the written impersonation, all at once. The target recognized the deception before any funds moved, a reminder that the same attack against a less skeptical target could easily have succeeded.
A Ferrari executive received WhatsApp messages, followed by a phone call purporting to be from CEO Benedetto Vigna, citing a confidential acquisition that required immediate assistance with a currency-hedge transaction. The scammer used AI deepfake technology to mimic Vigna's voice and even his southern Italian accent, which the executive described as nearly perfect.
The scam failed when the executive tested the caller by asking the title of a book Vigna had recently recommended, a shared-knowledge question, the kind of verification primitive attackers can't scrape from public audio.
Deepfake attacks can also target the hiring pipeline, where deepfaked candidates pass interviews, accept offers, and gain insider access from day one.
State-sponsored IT workers from North Korea have used stolen identities, fake websites, and residential "laptop farm" addresses to fraudulently obtain remote IT employment at U.S. companies. Because most operators don't physically reside in the U.S., small networks at drop locations turn on company-issued computers and configure them for remote access. The worker then connects via VPN so that access logs appear to be U.S.-based.
The DOJ has charged individuals tied to schemes infiltrating hundreds of companies and channeling proceeds back to the regime.
In one of the most cleanly documented variants of the scheme, KnowBe4 hired a North Korean threat actor as a principal software engineer on its AI team, but caught the actor before they gained access to the corporate network. The investigation showed that the threat actor used deepfake technology to obtain the job and a VPN to manipulate their location, after HR conducted four video-conference interviews confirming the individual matched the photo on the application.
The incident shows how a deepfaked candidate can survive a thorough hiring process and that strong post-hire monitoring is what closes the gap.
Deepfakes can also pass liveness checks and document verification at the identity-proofing stage. Attackers now bypass many of these controls by feeding synthetic media directly into the video data stream at the software layer.
A fraudster merged their own face onto photos of stolen identity documents and submitted manipulated selfies via ABN AMRO's standard onboarding flow. The bank's verification compared the submitted selfie against the ID document photo, and because both showed the same synthetic face, the match succeeded.
The fraudster opened 46 bank accounts before the bank detected the scheme. The exposed gap is structural: a selfie-to-document match assumes neither side is synthetic, and that assumption no longer holds.
Attackers injected AI-generated deepfake photos into the digital KYC process of a major Indonesian financial institution's mobile app to obtain fraudulent loans. Face-swapping technology replaced the applicant's face with another person's in real time, creating synthetic faces that mimic expressions well enough to deceive facial recognition.
The attack flow is a virtual camera driver sitting between the operating system and the KYC app, which means that blink- and motion-based liveness checks are no longer reliable because the controls could be watching a video stream controlled by an attacker.
Deepfakes can also impersonate executives and other recognizable individuals in consumer-facing scam campaigns. The precise target matters here: deepfakes impersonate people, and the downstream damage lands on the company those people work for.
Scammers constructed a deepfake of Binance Chief Communications Officer Patrick Hillmann, drawing on previous news interviews and television appearances, and used it to impersonate him on calls with Binance customers and business contacts.
The impersonation weaponized executive trust to drive fraud at the customer level, the kind of campaign that erodes confidence in legitimate communications even when no individual victim's loss traces to a control failure inside the firm.
Scammers impersonated UK consumer-finance personality Martin Lewis in a deepfake video advertisement that ran on Facebook and Instagram. The ad used his face and voice to promote an investment app called Quantum.AI, supposedly backed by a $3 billion investment from Elon Musk, and was presented as a clip from a This Morning segment where Lewis often provides advice.
The example shows that public-figure deepfakes don't need to reach a single corporate workflow to cause damage; they reach the public directly through ad platforms, with reputational fallout for the named individual and any associated brand.
Preparing for deepfake impersonation requires two things to work together. First, employees need rehearsed exposure to realistic synthetic-voice and video lures within their actual workflows. Second, they need verification procedures that don't depend on the senses attackers can now spoof.
These three practices work as a system rather than in isolation: simulations build the reflex to pause, out-of-band verification gives that pause somewhere productive to go, and a live feedback loop keeps both calibrated against what attackers are running this quarter.
Doppel is the AI-native social engineering defense platform that combines Digital Risk Protection (DRP) and Human Risk Management (HRM) to prepare employees to spot and stop deepfake attacks.
DRP gives the external view, tracking impersonation campaigns targeting the company's executives and brand across the surfaces attackers use. HRM runs the internal program that turns those signals into training and verification practice for the people most likely to be targeted. Wiring the two together means the deepfake lure used against the company today becomes the drill employees see tomorrow, rather than waiting for a quarterly content refresh. Three capabilities matter most for the deepfake threat specifically.
Security teams can run deepfake drills that mirror how real attackers operate, rather than relying on static phishing templates.
The result is a drill that resembles the actual attack employees are likely to see, rather than a generic phishing test that bears no relation to it.
Every simulation generates a profile showing what each employee actually did, not just whether they passed or failed.
This turns helpdesk verification gaps and individual habits into concrete training targets, rather than a single org-wide compliance number.
External detection and internal training run as one loop, so the lure attackers are using this week becomes the drill employees see next.
Together, these capabilities turn the workforce into a functioning control layer for the part of the attack surface that technical tooling alone can't reach, and keep that layer calibrated against live external threat signals so the drills evolve as fast as the attacks do.
The sophistication of deepfake attacks will continue to improve, and technical controls won’t always prevent attacks that target trust rather than access. The best defense against deepfake attacks is a workforce that has already practiced against such attacks and operates verification procedures that withstand convincing fakes.
When a workforce is trained to recognize and challenge deepfakes, every attempt the attacker mounts is a sunk cost. The cloned voice doesn't get the wire, the staged Teams call doesn't get the credential, the deepfaked candidate doesn't get the offer. After enough failed runs, the economics no longer work, and the attacker moves on to a softer target.
Request a demo to see how Doppel's deepfake simulations and threat-to-training feedback loop prepare your workforce for the deepfake threats.
Join hundreds of companies already using our platform to protect their brand and people from social engineering attacks.