Join us at RSA for a chance to win a MacBook Neo (opens in new tab)
Human Risk Management Use Case

Compliance & Audit-Readiness

Compliance frameworks increasingly require organizations to demonstrate that employees follow secure processes, not just that policies exist. Doppel provides continuous, evidence-backed validation that employees respond appropriately to real-world social engineering scenarios, helping security and GRC teams prove operational readiness during audits.

Modern compliance frameworks — from SOC 2 and ISO 27001 to NIST and industry-specific regulations — expect organizations to demonstrate that security controls work in practice.

Why now?

Compliance that means something

Policies, training modules, and annual awareness courses are no longer sufficient evidence. Social engineering attacks target human behavior and operational workflows, which means organizations must show that employees consistently follow verification procedures, escalate suspicious activity, and avoid granting unauthorized access. Without measurable testing and documentation, proving that readiness to auditors becomes difficult and time-consuming.

By the numbers

The Human Risk Landscape

41%
of social engineering attacks are multi-channel
60%
of breaches involve the human element
$4.8M
average cost of a social engineering breach
4x
increase in phishing email reporting after training
Why Doppel?

How Doppel Supports Compliance Programs

Continuous Control Validation

Run threat-informed simulations across email, messaging, voice, and collaboration tools to validate that employees follow required security procedures in real-world scenarios. Continuously test whether identity verification, reporting workflows, and escalation protocols hold up under realistic attacker pressure.

Always-On Compliance Readiness

Maintain an ongoing cycle of testing, training, and improvement that demonstrates control effectiveness and provides audit-ready documentation for security and compliance programs.

Defensible Behavioral Evidence

Every simulation interaction is captured and documented—who verified identity, who escalated suspicious activity, and where exceptions were granted. This behavioral data provides auditable evidence that human-layer security controls are functioning as intended.

Why Human Risk Management Matters for Compliance

Auditors increasingly ask organizations to demonstrate how their security awareness programs translate into real-world resilience. Traditional programs rely on static training modules or basic phishing simulations, which measure engagement but not operational behavior. Modern attackers exploit the same workflows auditors expect organizations to secure: password resets, access approvals, vendor requests, and financial authorization processes.

Validating how employees respond to these scenarios provides measurable evidence that security procedures are understood and followed.

Doppel enables organizations to simulate realistic attack scenarios, deliver required training in a way that drives meaningful behavioral change, and captures the signals that demonstrate compliance readiness and gives security leaders defensible proof that controls are functioning as intended.

Outcomes that Matter

Stay Compliant and Protected

Leverage threat-informed training material that meets compliance needs while also raising awareness for the most modern threats. Generate custom & deepfake-driven content based on specific scenarios or compliance frameworks.

Test Against Active Threats

Validate learnings through simulations that use lures modeled on current attacker techniques, keeping simulation content aligned with the latest TTPs. Identify and remediate risky behaviors before they surface during audits or investigations.

Audit-Ready Reporting

Every training completion, simulation interaction, data submission, and click is measured and tracked for a defensible understanding of where risk lies. In-depth reporting surfaces strengths, weaknesses, and confidence levels making it easy to demonstrate compliance.

Operational Readiness

Many compliance-driven incidents begin externally: impersonations, fraudulent domains, fake profiles, credential exposure, and brand abuse. Digital Risk Protection helps you monitor and disrupt external threats that can invalidate internal controls.

Extend Compliance Coverage with Digital Risk Protection

Many compliance-driven incidents begin externally: impersonations, fraudulent domains, fake profiles, credential exposure, and brand abuse. Digital Risk Protection helps you monitor and disrupt external threats that can invalidate internal controls.

FAQS

Frequently asked questions

Is "security awareness training" enough for compliance?
Training is necessary but not sufficient. Compliance frameworks increasingly expect evidence that controls work in practice, validated through realistic testing, measurable behavioral outcomes, and documented remediation processes.
What does Doppel measure for compliance reporting?
Behavioral outcomes including training progress, quiz pass rates, protocol adherence, reporting speed, response readiness across realistic social engineering scenarios, and improvement over time. These metrics go far beyond "completed training" checkboxes.
How does SED relate to compliance?
SED provides a campaign-level framework (detect, prevent, disrupt, defend) that better matches modern social engineering threats than single-channel controls. This alignment helps organizations demonstrate controls that are proportional to actual risk.
Which compliance frameworks does Doppel help satisfy?
Doppel supports evidence requirements across SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, PCI, HIPAA, GDPR, DORA, and industry-specific frameworks. The behavioral metrics and continuous testing model maps naturally to control validation requirements. Doppel also allows companies to generate custom, compliant training content based on uploaded source materials or frameworks.
How often should we test to maintain compliance?
Continuous testing is the gold standard—quarterly at minimum is required for many compliance frameworks. Annual point-in-time exercises are increasingly insufficient for auditors who want evidence of ongoing program maturity and measurable risk reduction over time.

Make your compliance checkbox meaningful

Demonstrate alignment with training and security policies while taking provable steps to lower your organization's exposure to social engineering.